元旦遊行 2005 - 網上調查自由意見
 

其他意見

日 期: 2005-01-01 13:54:16
意 見: Poliitics have stifled HK and is hurting everyone. Macao can make seven economic and social decisions in one year, it takes HK seven years to get one thing done. Democracy has been abused, and the majority of people will assume their personal rights and benefits as what they should ;fight for;. HK is grossly naive and young in its political maturity (and that includes me)

日 期: 2005-01-01 13:56:07
意 見: I wish the media can publicized more "+" and effective opinions. Complains and criticisms will only destroy what have been built in the past.

日 期: 2005-01-01 14:24:05
意 見: 政客神棍休想搞亂香港。

日 期: 2005-01-01 15:33:41
意 見: 香港人清醒下,請分清誰是真心為香港好,誰想搞亂香港使衰過回歸前。

日 期: 2005-01-01 16:03:02
意 見: 假使這次遊行仍然不能夠迫使這夥流氓政客破壞香港整體利益的意欲有所收歛,我建議主辦單位再次號召市民上街遊行,以維護香港長遠的發展。

日 期: 2005-01-01 16:49:02
意 見: HK SAR Gov't is too week, & HK people are the most shameful Chinese in the whole world. They do not have a sense of nationality, not to mention being patrioltic. They deny themselves as Chinese & think foreign countries are really democratic. When they live outside the Chinese land, they will know foreign treat Chinese worst than dogs. Then they will know their identity. Chinese on foreign lands are like orphans. Chinese need a mom to take care. We need a strong China. The Northern American Eagle attacked Iraq. not because of their having massive weapons, but the Eagle wants to control Iraq's oil. After the breaking the USSR, the Eagle takes China as its biggest enemy. It wants to suffoicate China, by helping Japan on the east, Taiwan on the south-east, India on the south-west (Russia is already a jeopardy of China on the north-west). Chinese people need to know their identity; foreign people are exploiting us. I have been immigrated to foreign, so I know how o/s people treat Chinese. I think some unknown black-hands are working behind those irresponsible LegCo members; their aim is to damage HK's economy in the short term, but to give difficulties to China as an end. HK people need to know their identity, try to attract foreign investors and work together. We don't have enough bosses in Hong Kong.

日 期: 2005-01-01 17:32:27
意 見: The rally of anti-cheng is not professionally organised but all the participants are self-initiated.

日 期: 2005-01-01 17:47:54
意 見: HONG KONG PEOPLE SHOULD POLICE OUR POLITICAL FIGURES, ESPECIALLY THE LEGISLATIVE COUCILLORS WHO ARE ELECTED AND REPRESENT US IN PURSUING THE WELL BEING AND PROTECTING THE GENERAL INTERESTS OF HONG KONG PEOPLE. WE SHOULD STAND OUT AND CONDEMN,WITHOUT FEAR AND FAVOUR, THOSE WHOSE ACT AND CONDUCT ARE AGAINST THE INTEREST OF HONG KONG PEOPLE

日 期: 2005-01-01 17:50:14
意 見: 為甚牲q臺,電視,傳媒沒有事先佈道元旦將有反政棍遊行?傳媒應該公正持平.

日 期: 2005-01-01 18:02:14
意 見: Sorry for the Ming Pao and cable TV for under reporting the number of participants in the rally.

日 期: 2005-01-01 18:56:07
意 見: 打倒政棍,維護香港安定繁榮

日 期: 2005-01-01 19:16:36
意 見: I want everyone live in HK happy and have their job. I want people live together peacefully.

日 期: 2005-01-01 19:58:38
意 見: 主辦機構、團體搞此次遊行沒有像偽民主派那樣專業扇情。

日 期: 2005-01-01 21:55:13
意 見: 爭取正確表達個人意見,反對所謂民正派人土及政棍們亂講亂港, 偽做民意.天天嘈,夜夜鬧. 為反對而反對,又成日說自己是香港人的代表,呸!真不知所謂. 祈求還一個安靜給香港人.

日 期: 2005-01-01 22:00:15
意 見: We can get information from various newspaper in WWW

日 期: 2005-01-01 22:11:39
意 見: 集會有正面作用

日 期: 2005-01-01 22:46:03
意 見: Commercial Radio is a very "BAD" media who did not allow all people to talk what they want, they selected the opinion for their views only. They are purely destructive and not instructive. As a media, they should keep neutral and only listen to what the people said and analyse smartly on the pros & cons rather than speaking subjectively.

日 期: 2005-01-01 23:24:54
意 見: 關於遊行人數 , 我覺得傳媒經常有既定立場, 民主派的就報大數, 其他就報細

日 期: 2005-01-02 00:54:07
意 見: 希望香港能有有良知, 有遠見, 有計劃建設好香港的政治人士, 提出好政綱, 不要只顧為反而反, 有破壞無建設.

日 期: 2005-01-02 01:13:31
意 見: 民主祈福黨當民意如無物,天氣那麼冷,沒有政黨及在政棍的電子傳煤?黑下,也有那麼多人,都算是十分成功\了.

日 期: 2005-01-02 10:17:09
意 見: 1) 本人認為蘋果日報是一份只反映反政府和偏幫某些政治人物的報章, 因一份持平的報章不會單單報導是次遊行的反面, 如只報導"示 威 者 行 完 有 免 費 泰 菜 食"(本人不排除有示威 者 行 完 有 免 費 泰 菜 食, 但本人一定不是, 同時廿名遊行人士能反映近萬人士嗎), 而不反映是次遊行人士的訴求,並 在是次遊行之前隻字不提, 那是一份報章應有的態度嗎?(強調本人不是左 派人士)2) 在A2, A3, B2-B6中, 應加入"沒意見/不適用", 因為"記不起/不知道"對本人來說是反映本人有少許\愚昧o

日 期: 2005-01-02 12:55:55
意 見: 民主故重要, 民生更加重要, 民主可以漸進, 民生須要保持,如果市民生活都有問題, 如何說民主?

日 期: 2005-01-02 14:14:24
意 見: 希望香港有真的自由、和平

日 期: 2005-01-02 15:06:13
意 見: Pls let me know if i can offer any assistance in criticising those so called demorcratic party

日 期: 2005-01-02 19:18:15
意 見: 這是我第一次參加遊行,以前?參加訑行是覺得政府已經好努力,這次參加遊行是因為覺得政府這麼多年施政?有改善是因為議會和政府之間太多爭吵,以致太多時間用於爭吵上,反而太少時間用於行政立法上,而本人覺得這問題主要是因為某些議員為求出位,保持知名度而在無必要的地方多生事端,希望這次行可以令某幾位議員自我檢討。

日 期: 2005-01-02 20:32:37
意 見: 搞亂香港經濟的議員要下台,香港議員要多搞好經濟,少搞政治,少遊行

日 期: 2005-01-02 20:56:41
意 見: 希望社會和平?定,搞好經濟,政客唔好成日叫人遊行,陳日君搞佢\自己宗?的事,少搞香港的政治.不要07 08普選,香港應該行政主導,不要政棍神棍搞亂香港

日 期: 2005-01-02 22:29:55
意 見: 希望香港有和諧的生活, 經濟好, 人民生活安定, 其他所謂民主派的政棍, 不要攪亂香港人的正常平靜的生活。

日 期: 2005-01-02 22:33:07
意 見: sick and tired of too much political noises; all criticisim, not constructive solutions from politicians and Legco members; need someone to do real work not political show for Hong Kong

日 期: 2005-01-02 23:08:13
意 見: let's have a strong united hong kong and work together for the betterment of everyone.

日 期: 2005-01-02 23:37:19
意 見: 希望某些政黨不要為反對而反對, 儘量協且助社會安定繁榮

日 期: 2005-01-03 01:58:29
意 見: I noticed the mass media (both television and radio) played down the event. Besides, newspapers such as Ming Pao (the most bias) and Apple Daily did not reflect the real situation. They deliberately stressed the rally was not free from political influence and the participants were of low quality, who tend to use abusive language. Furthermore, I do not think those phone-in or affairs programmes are neutral. They have standpoint and reject those opposite opinion. They refused to reply those who challenge them. Say the West Kowloon Cultural District as an example, there are a lot of people who have columns in newspapers and they opposite the project in one way or another. When I write to them and challenge their view and ask them to reply me direct or in public. I neve got a reply. Instead, I saw them keep on and on attacking others (Mr Donald TSANG). The phenomenum made me furious. I think they are all hypocrites. I was very glad that some people arranged such a meaningful event to let me air my grievances. I think the freedom of speech in Hong Kong did not have much as we think. Quite a number of people have connection with the mass medai and they are given the widest publicity. People who have opposite idea are in lack of a channel to express themselves.

日 期: 2005-01-03 09:18:06
意 見: 希望鄭經翰, 梁國雄, 涂\謹申等人懂自動離職立法會.不要厚顏無恥留在立法會.貪戀區區每月幾萬銀人工.

日 期: 2005-01-03 15:52:47
意 見: 非常不滿有一個電台歪曲事實,向外公怖說只有1千人遊行,這個人居心何在,為什麼要欺騙聽眾,這個人新聞措手有問題,冇資格做傳媒工作者,希望電台炒佢\尤魚,等佢\自己去做街頭戰士。

日 期: 2005-01-03 16:32:22
意 見: 反對傳媒刻意醜化政府、恣意畛蓮F府人員、譁憎寵,失去傳媒應負的責任及道德。

日 期: 2005-01-03 19:03:47
意 見: 香港以前是英國殖民地﹐港人沒有國家的概念﹐大多數的港人不知道自己是中國人。希望港大能多點這方面的教育與活動。身為中國人﹐一定要愛中國。中國才會越來越強盛﹐只有國家強盛﹐中國人走到那裡才不會讓人欺負。日本侵華時代有漢奸。英國統治香港有漢奸﹐現在回歸了。不能﹐也不應該再有漢奸了。只有大家團結一致﹐才能讓想做漢奸的人無機可乘。愛自己的國家人人有責。

日 期: 2005-01-03 19:36:50
意 見: 沉默的一群(650萬人)之一, 從未遊行過。現要站起來, 反對某些政治流氓及垃圾議員禍國殃港。我們要求繁榮穩定。

日 期: 2005-01-03 20:41:01
意 見: 十分不滿某部份立法會議員.如梁國雄,鄭經翰 ,陳偉業 等政治垃及沒有真正回歸之.所謂律師議員搗亂香港

日 期: 2005-01-03 21:48:57
意 見: 1.不希望香港成為政治城市,充滿對立和滶哄C2.香港需要穩定才能繼續繁榮。

日 期: 2005-01-03 22:29:17
意 見: pls be unbiased and objective. Democracy is to respect the 'minority' - which is in fact the silent majority.

日 期: 2005-01-03 22:45:02
意 見: 香港太多無良政客, 為選票, 為反對而反對, 大玩黑臉白臉, 無形中大大損害港人利益, 可悲這泵h人受蒙蔽. 感覺這些政客, 媒體主持與文化大革命時的紅衛兵無異, 凡是不吹捧毛澤東的通通是反革命份子.有此議員日日要茈韝膝J衫, 這與當年個個人身上都要戴毛澤東像章, 個人崇拜, 這又有什洶嬪O.可悲也政客們!!!!!!!!

日 期: 2005-01-04 09:53:35
意 見: The HKSAR Govt needs more support rather than unreasonable challenge. I can see many Legco members are aim at getting more power rather than genuinely serving the community. Also, the democratic parties should avoid appearing to interfere the democracy process of PRC if they want to get more for HK. Regarding this, it is very unfortunate that many poeple feel that they are now making HK people to confront with the PRC central government. It would be contructive to talk with the central government on the future deveopment of the selections fo CE and Legco members rather than to appeal for 0708 which would certainly be in vain.

日 期: 2005-01-04 21:15:40
意 見: give more support to the government in order to mainltain the stability of HK and the benifit of our middle class

日 期: 2005-01-04 22:28:55
意 見: 強烈不滿有些政客為反對而反對而影響政府的施政, 完全不會顧及整體香港的發展. 為了一已的私利而任意惘為地影響香港. 現在的立法會給了這些政棍議席, 真的變了垃圾會了.我作為納稅人,強烈不滿把我所繳交了的薪俸稅給了這些政棍薪水!!!!!!!!!!!!!

日 期: 2005-01-05 08:52:41
意 見: We should understand and care about China as well as HKG in a macro-point of views, not just focus on our welfare. Ask what we have done for our country or city we live in, politician always mislead people to demand from others ... its sad and set a very bad example for our next generation.

日 期: 2005-01-05 10:41:34
意 見: 很痛快,很成功\!

日 期: 2005-01-05 13:31:35
意 見: Don't force us to demonstrate again!

日 期: 2005-01-05 23:27:49
意 見: 不滿明報翌日對有關遊行的報道似乎有些負面,只強調遊行標語暴力及刻意展示幾位在場人士的粗口手勢,並以學者意見為題認為是次遊行令社會分化。

日 期: 2005-01-05 23:29:14
意 見: 這次遊行氣氛很和平,個人自發參予的人很多,表達了對香港穩定繁榮的關切。

日 期: 2005-01-06 02:41:49
意 見: 今次遊行旗幟鮮明,反民主派議員,追求穩定和諧和理性的社會,目標非常貼近個人政治取向。今次遊行,是鮮有的政治取向貼近親中陣營的遊行,親中陣營鮮有類似標榜鮮明的遊行,遊行可鼓動親中陣營的士氣,這是激發我參與今次遊行的主要原因。

日 期: 2005-01-06 09:48:58
意 見: 多參與活動或遊行,警惕政客。

日 期: 2005-01-06 09:53:16
意 見: 政治 is not important for our HK. Not more politicize, we need solidify, hang together............Chinese are the best!!!!!!

日 期: 2005-01-06 14:01:03
意 見: The so-called demoracy parties do not make any noise again and please go back to their countries (USA,England....),please get out of HK,thanks God!

日 期: 2005-01-06 15:14:12
意 見: 打倒亂港人士,打倒外國在港政棍!!!


本網站內一切內容與香港大學立場無關。民意專欄內的文章及民意平台內的言論及法律責任由作者自負,其餘內容則由民意研究計劃主任鍾庭耀博士負責。網站所載資料,包括問卷提問方式及各份研究報告,除非特別註明,知識產權皆由香港大學民意研究計劃擁有後,透過本網站向外全面開放。各界人士使用有關資料時,敬請註明出處。

香港大學民意研究計劃版權所有。 本網站由[email protected] 製作。最後更新 : 29/12/2005